Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 27;65(637):e545–e551. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X686125

Table 2.

Regression analysis of difference in means of consultation characteristics between PDDR groups, controlling for GP clustering

Relationship Crude difference in means (95% CI) P-value Adjusted for age of participants (95% CI) P-value Adjusted for participant factors (95% CI)a P-value Adjusted for GP factors (95% CI)b P-value Adjusted for all confounders (95% CI)c P-value
Consult length, seconds
Shallow Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference

Moderate 24 (−89 to 136) 0.05 −4 (−107 to 100) 0.49 −4 (−108 to 100) 0.51 4 (−101,109) 0.15 −15 (−119 to 90) 0.54

Deep 118 (1 to 236) 58 (−57 to 173) 57 (−59 to 172) 99 (−14 to 211) 46 (−70 to 161)

Number of problems
Shallow Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference

Moderate 0.2 (−0.3 to 0.6) 0.02 0.1 (−0.3 to 0.5) 0.34 0.1 (−0.3 to 0.5) 0.36 0.2 (−0.3 to 0.6) 0.06 0.1 (−0.3 to 0.5) 0.48

Deep 0.5 (0.1 to 0.8) 0.3 (−0.1 to 0.8) 0.3 (−0.1 to 0.8) 0.5 (0.1 to 1) 0.3 (−0.2 to 0.8)

Number of issues
Shallow Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference

Moderate 0.2 (−0.5 to 0.8) 0.01 0.1 (−0.5 to 0.8) 0.14 0.1 (−0.5 to 0.8) 0.14 0.2 (−0.5 to 0.9) 0.02 0.1 (−0.6 to 0.7) 0.22

Deep 1 (0.2 to 1.7) 0.7 (0 to 1.5) 0.7 (0 to 1.5) 0.9 (0.2 to 1.7) 0.6 (−0.1 to 1.4)
a

Adjusted for age and sex of participants, and deprivation area of practice.

b

Adjusted for GP’s age, sex of participants, and years worked at the practice.

c

Adjusted for age and sex of participants, deprivation area of practice, GP’s age, sex, and years worked at the practice. OR = odds ratio. PDDR = Patient–Doctor Depth of Relationship.