TABLE II.
Number of participants who are LOW during all four waves | % of participants LOW at age 8 who are LOW during all four waves | Number of participants who are HIGH during all four waves | % of participants HIGH at age 8 who are HIGH during all four waves | |
---|---|---|---|---|
HIGH and LOW defined by above or below total sample median for wave
| ||||
All participants | ||||
141 children LOW at age 8 | 52 | 37% | – | – |
89 children HIGH at age 8 | – | – | 31 | 35% |
Females | ||||
80 children LOW at age 8 | 29 | 36% | – | – |
38 children HIGH at age 8 | – | – | 7 | 18% |
Males | ||||
61 children LOW at age 8 | 23 | 38% | – | – |
51 children HIGH at age 8 | – | – | 24 | 47% |
HIGH defined by above 66.6 percentile for wave, LOW defined by below 33.3 percentile for wave
| ||||
All participants | ||||
99 children LOW at age 8 | 18 | 18% | – | – |
46 children HIGH at age 8 | – | – | 10 | 22% |
Note: The number of children categorized initially as LOW and HIGH at age 8 in this analysis is not the same because of greater attrition among the high-aggression participants. The data for the “triadic” categorization could not be computed by gender because the sample sizes would be too small.