Table 1.
HLA class I TUMAPs | HLA class II TUMAP | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUMAP selection criteria | IMA-ADF-001 | IMA-ADF-002 | IMA-APO-001 | IMA-CCN-001 | IMA-GUC-001 | IMA-K67–001 | IMA-MET-001 | IMA-MUC-001 | IMA-RGS-001 | IMA-MMP-001 |
Natural TUMAP presentation on RCC samples | ||||||||||
Natural presentation directly shown on RCC tumor samples | X | X | X | — | X | X | X | — | X | X |
TUMAP binding to HLA | ||||||||||
Demonstrated high-affinity binding to HLA-A*02 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | (X) | — | |
Predicted promiscuous binding to HLA-DR in >80% of patients1 | X | |||||||||
Demonstrated promiscuous binding to class II alleles1 | X | |||||||||
mRNA overexpression of TUMAP source protein | ||||||||||
Over-expression in RCC samples (% of analyzed RCC samples)2 | 95 | 95 | 100 | 93 | 90 | 85 | 98 | 65 | 80 | 70 |
Immunogenicity of TUMAPs | ||||||||||
In vitro immunogenicity demonstrated | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Immunogenicity proven in clinical trials | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Relevant cancer-associated functions of source proteins | ||||||||||
roles in cell cycle progression and tumor cell proliferation | X | X | X | |||||||
tumor invasion, cell migration, and metastasis | X | X | X | |||||||
linked to cancer-associated signaling pathways | X | X | X | X | ||||||
antiapoptotic effects | X | |||||||||
pro-angiogenic effects | X | X | ||||||||
renal cell carcinoma marker | X | X | X | X | ||||||
expression associated with mutations in the VHL gene | X | X | X | |||||||
expression correlated with higher tumor stage/grade | X | X | X | X | ||||||
overexpression linked to decreased survival in RCC | X | X | X |
1Not applicable to short HLA class I TUMAPs.
2Number of samples with expression > mean expression by normal tissues.