Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 1;11(4):970–982. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1010859

Table 5.

Proportion of subjects with ≥4-fold rise in antibody titers after vaccination with H2N2 LAIV or Placebo

After 1 dose (Day 28) LAIV: N=27 placebo: N=9 After 2 doses (Day 56) LAIV: N=27 placebo: N=7 After 2 doses (Day 112) LAIV: N=25 placebo: N=7 Cumulative conversions
Assay Test article n (%) 95% CI n (%) 95% CI n (%) 95% CI n (%) 95% CI
HAI: serum Ab LAIV 5 (18.5) 8.2–36.7 9 (33.3) 18.6–52.2 15 (60.0)1 40.7–76.6 16 (59.3) 40.7–75.5
Placebo 0 0.0–29.9 0 0.0–34.5 0 0.0–34.5 0 0.0–29.9
MN: serum Ab LAIV 8 (29.6) 15.9–48.5 12 (44.4)2 27.6–62.7 12 (48.0) 26.7–62.9 16 (59.3) 40.7–75.5
Placebo 0 0.0–29.9 0 0.0–34.5 0 0.0–34.5 0 0.0–29.9
ELISA: serum IgA LAIV 2 (7.4) 2.1–23.4 14 (51.9)3 34.0–69.3 12 (48.0)4 30.0–66.5 14 (51.9) 34.0–69.3
Placebo 0 0.0–29.9 0 0.0–34.5 0 0.0–34.5 0 0.0–29.9
ELISA: serum IgG LAIV 0 0.0–12.5 1 (3.7) 0.7–18.3 2 (8.0) 2.2–25.0 2 (7.4) 2.1–23.4
Placebo 0 0.0–29.9 0 0.0–34.5 0 0.0–34.5 0 0.0–29.9
ELISA: nasal IgA LAIV 6 (22.2) 10.6–40.8 11 (40.7) 24.5–59.3 n/a n/a 13 (48.1) 30.7–66.0
Placebo 0 0.0–29.9 0 0.0–34.5 n/a n/a 0 0.0–29.9
ELISA: salivary IgA LAIV 3 (11.1) 3.9–28.1 9 (33.3) 18.6–52.2 n/a n/a 12 (44.4) 27.6–62.7
Placebo 0 0.0–29.9 0 0.0–34.5 n/a n/a 0 0.0–29.9
Cumulative conversions LAIV 15 (55.6)5 37.3–72.4 23 (85.2)6 67.5–94.1 21 (84.0)7 65.3–93.6 23 (85.2) 67.5–94.1
Placebo 0 0.0–29.9 0 0.0–34.5 0 0.0–34.5 0 0.0–29.9

CI, 95% confidence interval as calculated by Wilson test; n/a – not applicable (nasal swab and saliva samples were not collected at Day 112); HAI – hemagglutination inhibition assay; MN – microneutralization; ELISA - Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Ab – antibody;

2 subjects had 4-fold rises in salivary IgA antibody titer at Day 56 compared to Day 28, and only 2-fold rise at Day 56 compared to Day 0;

1percent of subjects with HAI Ab conversions 84 d after 2nd vaccination is significantly higher in LAIV group than in Placebo group (Fisher exact (2–tailed) p = 0.008);

2percent of subjects with MN Ab conversions 28 d after 2nd vaccination is significantly higher in LAIV group than in Placebo group (Fisher exact (2–tailed) p = 0.036);

3percent of subjects with serum IgA conversions 28 d after 2nd vaccination is significantly higher in LAIV group than in Placebo group (Fisher exact (2–tailed) p = 0.026);

4percent of subjects with serum IgA conversions 84 d after 2nd vaccination is significantly higher in LAIV group than in Placebo group (Fisher exact (2–tailed) p = 0.029);

5cumulative percent of subjects with Ab conversions is significantly higher in LAIV group than in Placebo group (Fisher exact (2–tailed) p = 0.005);

6cumulative percent of subjects with Ab conversions 28 d after 2nd vaccination is significantly higher in LAIV group than in Placebo group (Fisher exact (2–tailed) p = 0.0001);

7cumulative percent of subjects with Ab conversions 56 d after 2nd vaccination is significantly higher in LAIV group than in Placebo group (Fisher exact (2–tailed) p = 0.0001);