Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 24;10(7):e0133570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133570

Table 2. Latent profile analysis models in hardcore smokers and non-hardcore smokers.

AIC BIC BIC (Adjusted) Entropy BLRT H0 LL-value p-value
Hardcore smokers
1 Class 4552.599 4586.474 4561.081 - - -
2 Classes 4309.581 4364.628 4323.364 .618 -2268.299 .0401
3 Classes 4167.676 4243.896 4186.761 .775 -2141.790 .0439
4 Classes 4099.934 4197.325 4124.320 .773 -2065.838 .0870
5 Classes 4041.397 4159.961 1071.085 .750 -2026.967 .2328
Non-hardcore smokers
1 Class 3181.690 3212.275 3186.898 - - -
2 Classes 3002.840 3052.540 3011.302 .694 -1582.845 .0039
3 Classes 2879.252 2948.067 2890.968 .806 -1488.420 .0019
4 Classes 2839.478 2927.408 2854.449 .795 -1421.626 .1420
5 Classes 2800.667 2907.712 2818.892 .810 -1396.739 .0436

Note: The optimal number of classes is presented in bold.