Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jun 12;56(1):e17–e51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.05.054

Table 9.

Appropriate Indications (Median Rating 7–9)

Indication Appropriate Use Score (1–9)
Extracranial Cerebrovascular Ultrasound
Evaluation for Cerebrovascular Disease—Potential Signs and/or Symptoms
1. • New or worsening hemispheric neurological symptoms (eg, unilateral motor or sensory deficit, speech impairment, or amaurosis fugax)
• Evaluation of transient ischemic attack or stroke
A (9)
2. • Hollenhorst plaque visualized on retinal examination A (8)
3. • Lightheadedness or impaired vision in the setting of upper extremity exertion
• Evaluation for subclavian-vertebral steal phenomenon
A (7)
5. • Suspected symptomatic vertebrobasilar occlusive disease in the symptomatic patient (eg, vertigo, ataxia, diplopia, dysphagia, dysarthria) A (7)
6. • Evaluation for suspected carotid artery dissection A (8)
7. • Pulsatile neck mass A (8)
8. • Cervical bruit
• No prior carotid artery assessment
A (7)
Evaluation for Cerebrovascular Disease—Asymptomatic With Comorbidities or Risk Factors for Carotid Artery Stenosis
9. • No cervical bruit
• Atherosclerotic disease in other vascular beds (eg, lower extremity PAD, coronary artery disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm)
A (7)
Follow-up or Surveillance for Carotid Artery Stenosis—Asymptomatic*
Surveillance Frequency During First Year
20. • Severe ICA stenosis (eg, 70% to 99%)
• At 6 to 8 months
A (7)
Surveillance Frequency After First Year
23. • Moderate ICA stenosis (eg, 50% to 69%)
• Every 12 months
A (7)
24. • Severe ICA stenosis (eg, 70% to 99%)
• Every 6 months
A (7)
24. • Severe ICA stenosis (eg, 70% to 99%)
• Every 12 months
A (7)
Surveillance After Carotid Artery Intervention
Surveillance Frequency During First Year
25. • Baseline (within 1 month) after carotid intervention A (8)
26. • Following normal ipsilateral ICA baseline study
• Surveillance at 6 to 8 months
A (7)
26. • Following normal ipsilateral ICA baseline study
• Surveillance at 9 to 12 months
A (7)
27. • Following abnormal ipsilateral ICA baseline study
• Surveillance at 6 to 8 months
A (7)
Surveillance Frequency After First Year
28. • Following normal ipsilateral ICA baseline study
• Surveillance every 12 months
A (7)
29. • Following abnormal ipsilateral ICA baseline study
• Surveillance every 12 months
A (7)
Renal and Mesenteric Artery Duplex
Evaluation for Renal Artery Stenosis—Potential Signs and/or Symptoms
Creatinine Elevation and/or Hypertension
34. • Malignant hypertension (>160/80 mm Hg) A (8)
35. • Resistant hypertension (>140/90 mm Hg on ≥3 meds) A (8)
36. • Worsening blood pressure control in long-standing hypertensive patient A (8)
37. • Hypertension in young person (age <35 years) A (8)
38. • Unexplained size discrepancy between kidneys (>1.5 cm; in longest dimension) A (7)
39. • Unknown cause of azotemia (eg, unexplained increase in creatinine) A (7)
40. • Increased creatinine (>50% baseline or above normal levels) after the administration of ACE/ARBs A (8)
41. • Acute renal failure with aortic dissection A (8)
42. • Epigastric bruit A (7)
Heart Failure of Unknown Origin
43. • Refractory heart failure A (7)
44. • “Flash” pulmonary edema A (8)
Evaluation for Mesenteric Artery Stenosis—Potential Signs and/or Symptoms
Symptomatic
48. • Post prandial pain or weight loss not otherwise explained
• GI evaluation previously completed
A (8)
Follow-up Testing for Renal Artery Stenosis—Asymptomatic
53. • Prior imaging indicates renal artery stenosis
• Determine hemodynamic significance
A (7)
Surveillance After Renal or Mesenteric Artery Revascularization
Asymptomatic
55. • Baseline surveillance (within 1 month) after revascularization A (8)
New or Worsening Symptoms After Baseline
56. • After renal or mesenteric artery revascularization A (8)
Asymptomatic or Stable Symptoms After Baseline Study, Surveillance Frequency After First Year
58. • After first 12 months after endovascular revascularization
• Surveillance every 12 months
A (7)
Aortic and Aortoiliac Duplex
Evaluation for Abdominal Aortic Disease—Signs and/or Symptoms
59. • Lower extremity claudication A (7)
62. • Aneurysmal femoral or popliteal pulse A (8)
63. • Pulsatile abdominal mass A (9)
64. • Decreased or absent femoral pulse A (7)
65. • Abdominal or femoral bruit A (7)
68. • Evidence of atheroemboli in the lower extremities, including ischemic toes A (8)
70. • Abnormal physiologic testing indicating aortoiliac occlusive disease A (8)
72. • Abnormal abdominal x-ray suggestive of aneurysm A (8)
73. • Presence of a lower extremity arterial aneurysm (eg, femoral or popliteal) A (8)
74. • Presence of a thoracic aortic aneurysm A (8)
Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm—Asymptomatic
75. • Men age >60 years
• First degree relative with an abdominal aortic aneurysm
A (8)
76. • Women age >60 years
• First degree relative with an abdominal aortic aneurysm
A (8)
77. • Men age 65 to 75 years
• Current or former smoker
A (8)
78. • Women age 65 to 75 years
• Current or former smoker
A (7)
79. • Age >75 years
• Current or former smoker
A (7)
Surveillance of Known Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
New or Worsening Symptoms
82. • Known abdominal aortic aneurysm (any size) A (9)
Asymptomatic or Stable Symptoms After Baseline Study, Surveillance Frequency During First Year
83. • Men, aneurysm 3.0 to 3.9 cm in diameter
• Surveillance at 9 to 12 months
A (7)
84. • Women, aneurysm 3.0 to 3.9 cm in diameter
• Surveillance at 9 to 12 months
A (7)
85. • Aneurysm 4.0 to 5.4 cm in diameter
• Surveillance at 6 to 8 months
A (7)
85. • Aneurysm 4.0 to 5.4 cm in diameter
• Surveillance at 9 to 12 months
A (7)
86. • Aneurysm ≥5.5 cm in diameter
• Surveillance at 3 to 5 months
A (7)
86. • Aneurysm ≥5.5 cm in diameter
• Surveillance at 6 to 8 months
A (7)
Asymptomatic or Stable Symptoms, No or Slow Progression During First Year, Surveillance Frequency After First Year
87. • Men, aneurysm 3.0 to 3.9 cm in diameter
• Surveillance every 12 months
A (7)
87. • Men, aneurysm 3.0 to 3.9 cm in diameter
• Surveillance every 24 months or greater
A (7)
88. • Women, aneurysm 3.0 to 3.9 cm in diameter
• Surveillance every 12 months
A (7)
88. • Women, aneurysm 3.0 to 3.9 cm in diameter
• Surveillance every 24 months or greater
A (7)
89. • Aneurysm 4.0 to 5.4 cm in diameter
• Surveillance every 12 months
A (7)
90. • Aneurysm ≥5.5 cm in diameter
• Surveillance every 6 months
A (8)
90. • Aneurysm ≥5.5 cm in diameter
• Surveillance every 12 months
A (7)
Asymptomatic or Stable Symptoms, Rapid Progression During First Year, Surveillance Frequency After First Year
91. • Men, aneurysm 3.0 to 3.9 cm in diameter
• Surveillance every 6 months
A (7)
91. • Men, aneurysm 3.0 to 3.9 cm in diameter
• Surveillance every 12 months
A (7)
92. • Women, aneurysm 3.0 to 3.9 cm in diameter
• Surveillance every 6 months
A (8)
92. • Women, aneurysm 3.0 to 3.9 cm in diameter
• Surveillance every 12 months
A (7)
93. • Aneurysm 4.0 to 5.4 cm in diameter
• Surveillance every 6 months
A (8)
93. • Aneurysm 4.0 to 5.4 cm in diameter
• Surveillance every 12 months
A (7)
94. • Aneurysm ≥5.5 cm in diameter
• Surveillance every 6 months
A (9)
Surveillance After Aortic Endograft or Aortoiliac Stenting
Baseline (Within 1 Month After the Intervention)
95. • Aortic or iliac endograft A (8)
96. • Aortic and iliac artery stents A (7)
New or Worsening Lower Extremity Symptoms After Baseline Exam
97. • Aortic or iliac endograft A (8)
98. • Aortic and iliac artery stents A (8)
Asymptomatic or Stable Symptoms After Baseline Study, Surveillance Frequency During First Year
100. • Aortic endograft with endoleak and/or increasing residual aneurysm sac size
• Surveillance at 6 to 8 months
A (8)
100. • Aortic endograft with endoleak and/or increasing residual aneurysm sac size
• Surveillance at 9 to 12 months
A (7)
Asymptomatic or Stable Symptoms After Baseline Study, Surveillance Frequency After First Year
102. • Aortic endograft without endoleak stable and/or decreasing residual aneurysm sac size
• Surveillance every 12 months
A (7)
103. • Aortic endograft with endoleak and/or increasing residual aneurysm sac size
• Surveillance every 6 months
A (8)
103. • Aortic endograft with endoleak and/or increasing residual aneurysm sac size
• Surveillance every 12 months
A (7)
Lower Extremity Artery Testing Using Multilevel Physiological Testing Alone or Duplex Ultrasound With Single Level ABI and PVR Evaluation for Lower Extremity Atherosclerotic Disease—Potential Signs and/or Symptoms
105. • Lower extremity claudication A (9)
106. • Leg/foot/toe pain at rest A (9)
107. • Foot or toe ulcer or gangrene A (9)
108. • Infection of leg/foot without palpable pulses A (9)
109. • Suspected acute limb ischemia (eg, cold, painful limb with pallor, pulselessness, parasthesias) A (9)
112. • Evidence of atheroemboli in the lower extremities A (8)
Surveillance of Known Lower Extremity PAD
New or Worsening Symptoms
115. • Normal baseline study A (7)
116. • Abnormal baseline ABI (ie, ABI <0.90) A (8)
Surveillance of Lower Extremity PAD After Revascularization (Duplex/ABI)
123. • Baseline Surveillance (within 1 month) A (8)
New or Worsening Symptoms
124. • After revascularization (angioplasty ± stent or bypass) A (9)
Asymptomatic or Stable Symptoms
Asymptomatic or Stable Symptoms After Baseline Study, Surveillance Frequency During First Year
126. • After vein bypass graft
• Surveillance at 6 to 8 months
A (8)
127. • After prosthetic bypass graft
• Surveillance at 6 to 8 months
A (7)
Asymptomatic or Stable Symptoms After Baseline Study, Surveillance Frequency After First Year
128. • After angioplasty ± stent placement
• Surveillance every 12 months
A (7)
129. • After vein bypass graft
• Surveillance every 12 months
A (7)
130. • After prosthetic bypass graft
• Surveillance every 12 months
A (7)
Lower Extremity Artery Testing With ABI Only
Screening for Lower Extremity Atherosclerotic Disease—Potential Signs
131. • Diminished pulses A (7)
132. • Femoral bruit A (7)
Lower Extremity Artery Testing With ABI Only
Screening for Lower Extremity Atherosclerotic Disease—Asymptomatic With Comorbidities
133. • Age >50 years
• With diabetes
A (7)
135. • Age >50 years
• Cigarette smoking (current or past)
A (7)
136. • Age >70 years A (7)
Lower Extremity Artery Testing With Duplex Ultrasound Only
Evaluation for Groin Complication After Femoral Access
137. • Pulsatile groin mass A (9)
138. • Bruit or thrill over the groin A (8)
140. • Significant hematoma A (7)
141. • Severe pain within groin post procedure A (7)
Upper Extremity Arterial Testing—Physiological Testing or Duplex Ultrasound Study
Evaluation for Upper Extremity PAD—Potential Signs and/or Symptoms
142. • Arm or hand claudication A (8)
143. • Finger discoloration or ulcer A (8)
144. • Unilateral cold painful hand A (8)
146. • Suspected positional arterial obstruction (eg, thoracic outlet syndrome) A (7)
147. • Upper extremity trauma with suspicion of vascular injury A (8)
150. • Pre-op radial artery harvest (eg, for CABG) A (7)
151. • Presence of pulsatile mass or hand ischemia after upper extremity vascular access A (8)
152. • Presence of bruit after upper extremity access for intervention A (8)
Upper Extremity Arterial Testing—Physiological Testing or Duplex Ultrasound Study
Surveillance of Upper Extremity PAD After Revascularization
153. Baseline (within 1 month) A (8)
New or Worsening Symptoms
154. • After revascularization (stent or bypass) A (8)
155. • Post trauma A (8)
156. • After vein bypass graft
• Surveillance at 6 to 8 months
A (7)
Asymptomatic or Stable Symptoms After Baseline Study, Surveillance Frequency After First Year
158. • After vein bypass graft
• Surveillance every 12 months
A (7)
159. • After prosthetic bypass graft
• Surveillance every 12 months
A (7)

A = appropriate; ABI = ankle-brachial index; ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB = angiotensin II receptor blocker; CABG = coronary artery bypass graft; CHF = congestive heart failure; CT = computed tomography; GI = gastrointestinal; ICA = internal carotid artery; PAD = peripheral artery disease; PVR = pulse volume recording.

*

In the setting of interval development of clinical symptoms in a previously asymptomatic patient or for rapid progression of stenosis during subsequent follow-up (eg, stenosis category change during a limited period of time), more intensive surveillance may be indicated.

Carotid artery occlusion to be addressed in the text of the document. Periodic surveillance duplex ultrasound should be performed according to the severity of stenosis of the contralateral side.