Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Jul 4;39(8):1518–1527. doi: 10.1111/acer.12781

Table 3.

PEth levels and proportions with detectable PEth at cohort entry, presented overall, and by drinker- and drink-types in 209 enrollees in the BREATH Cohort study (July 2011-September 2013). The table show median PEth levels and interquartile ranges and proportions that were PEth positive for participants grouped according to their characteristics. Participants were HIV-infected adults, newly enrolled into care (and not yet on antiretroviral therapy) at the Immune Suppression Syndrome Clinic in Mbarara, Uganda.

PEth concentration,
ng/ml, median (IQR)
Proportion PEth-
positive
Full sample (n=209)
 All subjects 57 (0-211) 70%
  No drinking in past 3 months 0 (0-8.5) 25%
  Low risk drinkers* 32 (0-133) 68%
  Unhealthy drinkers 133 (46-412) 90%
Females only(n=89)
 All females 19 (0-84) 56%
  No drinking in past 3 months 0 (0-0) 0%
  Low risk drinkers 16 (0-68) 57%
  Unhealthy drinkers 82 (32-170) 89%
Males only (n=120)
 All males 112 (15-326) 80%
  No drinking in past 3 months 15 (0-113) 59%
  Low risk drinkers 63 (7.5-187) 75%
  Unhealthy drinkers 257 (71-554) 91%
Stratified by beverage production and type (drinkers
only)
Beverage production type
 Locally-made alcohol only drinkers (n=36) 217 (26-440) 83%
 Commercially made alcohol only drinkers (n=111) 60 (13-170) 78%
 Both types 82 (57-304) 86%
Consumption of spirits
 Drank any spirits (n=69) 156 (21-411) 86%
 Did not drink any spirits (n=100) 57 (15-148) 77%
*

Unhealthy drinking = Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test – Consumption (AUDIT-C) score ≥4 for men or ≥3 for women; low risk drinking = AUDIT-C score <4 for men or <3 for women.