Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul 25;158(5):1008–1017. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.07.028

TABLE 2.

Results of multivariable regression analyses examining the relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in the better eye in subjects with glaucoma and controls, and driving simulator divided attention reaction times at low contrast (in logarithmic units).

Curve Negotiation Task
Log10 Curve Negotiation Divided Attention Reaction Time, adjusted R2 = 0.469.
Coefficient 95% CI P-Value
RNFL thickness in better eye (per 10μm) −0.24 −0.40 to −0.10 0.001
RNFL thickness in better eye squared (per 100μm2) 0.01 0.00 to 0.02 0.004
Age (per 10 years) 0.03 0.02 to 0.05 0.035
MD in better eye (dB) −0.02 −0.03 to −0.01 <0.001
Curve coherence −0.63 −1.10 to −0.15 0.010
Montreal Cognitive Assessment score −0.01 −0.02 to 0.01 0.337
Constant 1.59 0.74 to 2.44 <0.001
Car Following Task
Log10 Car Following Divided Attention Reaction Time, adjusted R2 = 0.316.
Coefficient 95% CI P-Value
RNFL thickness in better eye (per 10μm) −0.22 −0.41 to −0.04 0.019
RNFL thickness in better eye squared (per 100μm2) 0.01 0.00 to 0.02 0.004
Age (per 10 years) 0.03 0.00 to 0.06 0.057
MD in better eye (dB) −0.02 −0.03 to −0.01 0.001
Speed coherence −0.34 −0.65 to −0.04 0.029
Montreal Cognitive Assessment score 0.00 −0.01 to 0.02 0.712
Constant 0.99 −0.05 to 2.02 0.062

Abbreviations: RNFL = Retinal nerve fiber layer, MD = mean deviation.