Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 12;2015:517690. doi: 10.1155/2015/517690

Table 3.

Comparison with conventional injection sclerotherapy.

References Patients (n) Follow-up
(months)
Sclerosing agents Effectiveness
(%)
Complications
(%)
Recurrence
(%)
Additional therapy (%)
Greca et al. 1981 [27] 43 12 5% phenol 70.0 0 30.2 14.0
Gartell et al. 1985 [12] 109 33 5% phenol 70.0 0 25.7
Walker et al. 1990 [13] 28 48 5% phenol 35.7 70.2 64.2 14.3
Santos et al. 1993 [14] 189 48 5% phenol 60.3 0.5 8.5 22.2
Kanellos et al. 2003 [15] 80 48 5% phenol 17.5 36.3 63.0 30.0
Shi 1997 [16] 21,361 36 Xiaozhiling 99.0 4.6 1.0
Takano et al.
2006 [6]
95 12 ALTA 94.0 49.0 16.0
Tokunaga et al.
2010 [17]
784 4–30 ALTA 96.0 1.8
Hachiro et al.
2011 [7]
448 29 ALTA 3.1 3.1
Miyamoto et al.
2012 [18]
28 8–21 ALTA 100 21.4 10.7
Yano et al.
2014 [19]
57 48 ALTA 53 22.8
Present study
2015
83 27 ALTA 97.6 4.8 9.6 8.4

—: results absent or not clearly reported in the text.