Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 14;11(9):1016–1025. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.11751

Table 2.

Results of LRT for selection of cathepsin L-like family in vertebrates.

Model np estimates of parameters lnL LRT pairs df 2flnL positively selected sites (BEB)
M0:one ratio 1 ω0:one -21586.13
M3:discrete 5 p0=0.31,p1=0.46,p2=0.23,p0=0.05,p1=0.43,ω2=1.23 -20801.49 M0/M3 4 1569.28***
M1a:neutral 2 p0=0.56,p1=0.44,p0=0.17,p1=1.00 -20956.12
M2a:selection 4 p0=0.56,p1=0.34,p2=0.10,p0=0.17,p1=1.00,p2=1.00 -20956.12 M1a/M2a 2 0 3 site p<0.01: 159Q,284E,337E;4 site p<0.05: 238S, 260K, 291E, 305D
M7:beta 2 p=0.48,q=0.63 -20817.70
M8:beta&0 4 p0=0.92,p=0.56,q=0.88,(p1=0.08),ω0.08) -20780.34 M7/M8 2 74.72*** 8 site p<0.01:159Q, 202E, 238S, 260K,284E, 291E,305D,337E; 3 site p<0.05: 211Y,359A,364T
Fr:free ratios 92 see Figure -21416.49 M0/Fr 91 339.28***

Selection analysis by three types of models was performed using Codeml implemented in PAML. np: number of free parameters, InL: log likelihood. LRT: likelihood ratio test. df: degrees of freedom. 2∆LnL: twice the log-likelihood difference of the models compared. The significant tests at 5% cutoff are labeled with *, and those at 1% cutoff are labeled with ***.