Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 27;10(7):e0134062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134062

Table 4. Results of the sensitivity analysis for continuous outcomes.

Outcomes Group or Subgroup Set of data N patients, RC/LC Analysis model / Effect measure I 2 Summary Statistics 95% CI P value
Operative time Sensitivity analysis 1 9 329/597 RE/MD 87% 46.65 27.36 to 65.94 <0.00001
Sensitivity analysis 3 10 536/907 RE/MD 93% 47.01 28.08 to 65.95 <0.00001
Sensitivity analysis 4 12 549/946 RE/MD 93% 39.50 20.29 to 58.71 <0.0001
Estimated blood loss Sensitivity analysis 1 7 241/414 FE/ MD 15% -18.99 -25.51 to -12.46 <0.00001
Sensitivity analysis 3 8 387/697 FE/ MD 0% -16.15 -22.66 to -9.63 <0.00001
Sensitivity analysis 4 10 400/736 FE/MD 32% -15.72 -22.67 to -8.78 <0.00001
Time to first flatus Sensitivity analysis 1 4 219/363 RE/MD 60% -0.62 -0.94 to -0.29 0.0002
Sensitivity analysis 4 4 218/358 RE/MD 74% -0.53 -0.90 to -0.16 0.005
Length of hospital stay Sensitivity analysis 1 8 289/462 FE/ MD 49% -1.12 -1.51 to -0.74 <0.00001
Sensitivity analysis 2 13 515/840 RE/ MD 59% -0.77 -1.36 to -0.19 0.010
Sensitivity analysis 3 10 608/3160 RE/ MD 73% -0.71 -1.28 to -0.13 0.02
Sensitivity analysis 4 12 640/3228 RE/MD 67% -0.70 -1.24 to -0.15 0.01
Number of harvested lymph nodes Sensitivity analysis 1 5 241/388 RE/MD 63% 0.14 -2.75 to 3.03 0.92
Sensitivity analysis 3 8 402/645 RE/ MD 60% -0.21 -2.23 to 1.82 0.84
Sensitivity analysis 4 9 399/702 RE/MD 65% -0.95 -2.92 to 1.02 0.34
Costs Sensitivity analysis 1 3 65/62 FE/MD 0% 1.99 1.20 to 2.77 <0.00001
Sensitivity analysis 2 4 95/153 FE/MD 0% 2.02 1.24 to 2.80 <0.00001
Sensitivity analysis 3 3 225/2549 RE/ MD 56% 2.82 1.39 to 4.26 0.0001
Sensitivity analysis 4 4 220/2541 FE/MD 0% 3.29 2.06 to 4.53 <0.00001

FE: Fixed Effect; RE: Random Effect; MD: Mean Difference; CI: Confidence interval

1: Sensitivity analysis excluding data sets with mean or SD values estimated

2: Sensitivity analysis excluding the National database study by Tyler et al.

3: Sensitivity analysis excluding the studies without at least 20 patients for each treatment arms

4: Sensitivity analysis excluding the randomized clinical trial by Park et al.