Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 24;145(8):1763–1769. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.213074

TABLE 2.

Summary statistics for the absorption study data that were modeled1

TDZ, mg/d TDPA, mg/d TAZ, mg/d Age, mo wt, kg WAZ Ht, cm HAZ BMI, kg/m2 EZP,2mg EZP/wt, mg/kg PIZn,2 μg/dL CRP,2mg/L
Mean 3.88 739 0.86 24.2 10.7 −0.84 80.9 −1.28 16.3 44.9 4.22 69.5 4.64
Median 3.49 490 0.74 24.2 10.6 −0.87 82.0 −1.33 16.2 42.9 3.93 68.6 2.20
SD 2.27 632 0.49 12.1 2.1 1.02 9.3 1.53 1.7 15.6 1.42 14.7 7.79
Range 0.52–12.4 31–2557 0.10–2.66 8–50 6.4–15.8 −3.99–1.95 61.2–103.9 −4.9–3.50 11.8–23.6 7.3–121 0.89–14.3 29.9–119.1 0.01–44.2
Count 236 174 236 235 236 235 225 224 225 226 226 204 147
1

There were 106 male and 128 female subjects (gender was unknown for 2 subjects). CRP, C-reactive protein concentration; EZP, exchangeable zinc pool; EZP/wt, exchangeable zinc pool/body wt; HAZ, height/length-for-age z score; Ht, body length/height; PlZn, plasma zinc concentration; TAZ, total absorbed zinc; TDPA, total dietary phytate (phytic acid); TDZ, total dietary zinc; WAZ, weight-for-age z score.

2

Two or less biologically implausible values were removed (see text).