Skip to main content
. 2015 May 23;67(1):123–133. doi: 10.1007/s10493-015-9925-0

Table 2.

Summary of discriminant function analysis across the complete list of variables

Variable Wilks’ lambda Partial lambda p value Root 1 Root 2
Ch 0.237 0.962 0.12 −0.269 −0.039
SB 0.235 0.973 0.23 0.113 0.359
AW 0.240 0.952 0.070 −0.151 0.490
PW 0.231 0.986 0.47 0.091 −0.263
AP 0.228 0.999 0.96 −0.012 −0.055
ASB 0.233 0.980 0.33 −0.055 −0.286
AM 0.229 0.996 0.79 0.043 −0.118
PSB 0.242 0.944 0.045 0.103 −0.451
AL 0.239 0.956 0.090 0.298 −0.118
PL 0.231 0.989 0.56 −0.045 −0.193
S 0.248 0.920 0.011 0.341 −0.271
PaTr 0.229 0.997 0.85 −0.042 0.093
PaFe 0.237 0.963 0.13 0.250 0.149
PaGe 0.232 0.982 0.39 0.014 −0.245
PaTi 0.258 0.884 0.001 0.478 0.268
PaTa 0.266 0.859 <0.001 0.479 −0.290
Odo 0.237 0.965 0.14 −0.261 0.107
Leg I 0.241 0.949 0.059 −0.641 −0.051
Leg II 0.234 0.976 0.26 0.252 −0.610
Leg III 0.243 0.941 0.038 −0.731 0.475
dmt 0.243 0.938 0.032 0.272 0.327
fV 0.233 0.978 0.31 0.063 −0.261
fD 0.238 0.958 0.096 0.033 0.439
Eigenvalue 1.824 0.551
Cumulative proportion 0.768 1.000
Roots removed Eigenvalue Wilks’ lambda Chi square df p value
0 1.825 0.228 175.779 46 <0.001
1 0.551 0.645 52.215 22 <0.001

Chi square tests with successive roots removed are provided in the lower part of the table. Root 1 and Root 2 columns refer to standardized coefficients of canonical variables