Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 28;9:414. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00414

Table 4.

Performance of the TQWT-MCA spindle and K-complex detection method in each subject with minimal training.

Spindle K-complex
Sens % FDR% Th (μV2) Sens (%) FDR (%) Th (μV)
S1 61.54 20.00 300 78.57 21.42 −68
S2 85.00 50.00 210 88.89 27.27 −72
S3 100.00 27.27 240 81.81 10.00 −80
S4 62.50 16.67 300 75.00 10.00 −82
S5 73.91 19.05 270 57.14 11.11 −94
S6 81.43 23.25 280 83.33 23.08 −74
S7 96.30 35.00 240 60.00 14.28 −78
S8 90.62 9.37 270 80.76 20.00 −94
S9 90.00 47.06 230 88.89 11.11 −66
S10 95.65 21.43 260 93.33 12.50 −62
S11 100.00 50.00 210 100.00 26.67 −70
S12 100.00 23.68 270 33.33 88.88 −78
S13 76.19 11.11 300 83.33 45.22 −98
S14 68.42 31.58 340 80.00 42.86 −54
Mean 84.39 27.53 265.7 77.45 26.04 −76.4

Sensitivity Sen (%), FDR (%), and the optimal threshold (Th) are reported for each individual but also as mean values across the whole population (bottom row). Only 15 annotated 30-s EEG segments were used for training in each subject (corresponding on average to 18 ± 4.3 spindles and 11.9 ± 2.3 K-complex training events).