Table 5.

Odds Ratio and 95% CI of sexual behavior, intention by PMT constructs and HIV/AIDS knowledge among Indian youth

Variables	Estimate	OR values (95% CI)	Wald χ2	P values
	Intention to have sex
PMT
Self-efficacy	0.31	1.36 (0.88, 2.10)	1.91	0.1669
Response efficacy	0.34	1.40 (1.01, 1.96)	3.99	0.0457
Response cost	−0.07	0.93 (0.60, 1.44)	0.11	0.7392
Extrinsic rewards	−1.21	0.30 (0.19, 0.48)	24.64	<.0001
Intrinsic rewards	0.60	1.82 (1.40, 2.37)	19.92	<.0001
Severity	0.15	1.16 (0.67, 2.01)	0.29	0.5875
Vulnerability	0.80	2.22 (1.40, 3.50)	11.73	0.0006
HIV/AIDS knowledge	0.03	1.03 (0.92, 1.14)	0.24	0.6236
	Engage in sex
PMT
Self-efficacy	0.54	1.71 (1.04, 2.82)	4.41	0.0357
Response efficacy	0.13	1.14 (0.76, 1.71)	0.42	0.5154
Response cost	0.21	1.23 (0.73, 2.09)	0.62	0.4317
Extrinsic rewards	−0.65	0.52 (0.30, 0.90)	5.47	0.0193
Intrinsic rewards	0.41	1.51 (1.10, 2.06)	6.59	0.0103
Severity	0.42	1.52 (0.71, 3.28)	1.17	0.2798
Vulnerability	0.22	1.25 (0.71, 2.19)	0.60	0.4393
HIV/AIDS knowledge	−0.01	0.99 (0.88, 1.11)	0.05	0.8209

Adjusted for gender, age, urbanity, SES using logistic regression analysis

Higher values on the self-efficacy, response efficacy, severity and vulnerability subscales, and lower values on the intrinsic rewards, extrinsic rewards and response cost subscales indicate a protective effect