Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: Neurosurgery. 2015 Mar;76(0 1):S57–S63. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000462078.58454.f4

Table 2.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes between the durotomy and no durotomy groups.

Outcome No durotomy
(n=371)
Durotomy
(n=38)
p-value
Specific Procedures 0.54
 Decompression Only 321 (88%) 33 (89%)
 Non instrumented Fusion 19 (5%) 3 (8%)
 Instrumented Fusion 23 (6%) 1 (3%)
Multi-level Fusion 15 (4%) 1 (3%) 0.99
Decompression Level
 L2–L3 129 (36%) 17 (45%) 0.35
 L3–L4 251 (69%) 29 (76%) 0.47
 L4–L5 335 (92%) 36 (95%) 0.82
 L5–S1 134 (37%) 19 (50%) 0.16
Levels Decompressed 0.082
None 8 (2%) 0 (0%)
1 86 (23%) 7 (18%)
2 120 (32%) 7 (18%)
3+ 157 (42%) 24 (63%)
Operation time (min) 125.2 (66.8) 161.7 (44.5) 0.001
Blood loss (ml) 288.9 (396.1) 534.4 (421.8) <0.001
Blood Replacement
 Intraoperative replacement 33 (9%) 6 (16%) 0.26
 Post-operative transfusion 17 (5%) 3 (8%) 0.59
Length of stay (days) 3.1 (2.4) 4.3 (2.1) 0.003
Intraoperative complications§
 Vascular injury 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
 Other 3 (1%) 0 (0%) 0.66
 None 368 (99%) 38 (100%)
*

Surgical information was available for 371 non-durotomy and 38 durotomy patients.

Specific procedure data was available for 363 non-durotomy and 37 durotomy patients.

§

No cases were reported of aspiration into the respiratory tract or operation at wrong level.