Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 31;6(5):3201–3210. doi: 10.1039/c5sc00584a

Table 1. Selected optimization studies a .

Inline graphic
Entry Ligand (12 mol%) Solvent Bite angle b (°) Yield c
1 dppf Xylenes 96 24% (34%)
2 dppm Xylenes 72 <5%
3 dppe Xylenes 85 <5%
4 dppp Xylenes 91 13%
5 dppb Xylenes 98 29%
6 DPEphos Xylenes 104 11%
7 t-BuXphos Xylenes 43%
8 Xantphos Xylenes 111 85%
9 Xantphos m-Xylene 111 63% (71%)
10 Xantphos o-Xylene 111 29% (35%)
11 Xantphos p-Xylene 111 62%
12 Xantphos Ethylbenzene 111 91%

aConditions: ynone 1a (0.20 mmol), [Rh] : ligand = 1 : 1.2, solvent (0.1 M).

bSee ref. 12 for bite-angle values.

cIsolated yields; number in parenthesis is percent conversion of starting material.