Skip to main content
. 2015 Summer;14(3):933–942.

Table 2.

Effect of different extract of L. reticulata on Formalin induced Paw edema test.

Treatment Increase in paw volume
% Inhibition of Edema
(mg/Kg) 0 h 1 h 2 h 4 h 1 h 2 h 4 h
Control 0.66±0.87 1.24±0.51 1.62±0.22 2.36±0.88 - - -
EA (400) 0.56±0.76 1.02 ±0.49 1.13±0.91 1.41 ±0.72 18±0.11c 30±0.2c 40±0.21c
EA (600) 0.55±0.38 0.82 ±0.97 0.87 ±0.18 0.93±0.17 33.87±0.21b 46.29±0.3b 60.59±0.43b
Meth(400) 0.63±0.51 1.14 ±0.88 1.40±0.19 1.86±0.15 8±0.19e 13.58±0.1d 21.18±0.19e
Meth(600) 0.61±0.44 1.09 ±0.71 1.31 ±0.23 1.58 ±0.63 12.09±0.1d 19.13±0.2d 33.05±0.23cd
Water(400) 0.64±0.57 1.18 ±0.73 1.51 ±0.92 2.15 ±0.75 5±0.12e 7±0.18e 9±0.16f
Water(600) 0.63±0.97 1.17 ±0.61 1.56±0.84 2.19 ±0.95 6±0.1e 4±0.15e 7±0.13f
Diclofenac
Sodium (50)
0.49±0.66 0.60±0.11 0.65±0.66 0.68±0.59 52±0.26a 60±0.32a 71±0.4a

F-value 323.85

Note: The Values within each column represent, Mean ± SE followed by same letters in superscript are not significantly different from each other (P< 0.0001). Data analysed by GLM procedure with Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) using SAS®.

***

at α = 0.05