Table 2.
Outcome | Estimate | 95% CI | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Primary outcome | |||
PCC conflict | |||
Count rate ratio | 0.850 | 0.763–0.943 | 0.001 |
Hurdle rate ratioa | 1.139 | 0.915–1.426 | 0.234 |
PCC containment | |||
Count rate ratio | 0.768 | 0.655–0.901 | 0.004 |
Hurdle rate ratioa | 1.044 | 0.828–1.336 | 0.708 |
Secondary outcomesb | |||
WAS | |||
Order and organisation | −0.315 | −0.792 to 0.163 | 0.197 |
Programme clarity | 0.267 | −0.218 to 0.753 | 0.281 |
Staff control | −0.196 | −0.568 to 0.176 | 0.301 |
SHAS | |||
Total | 0.227 | −3.375 to 3.829 | 0.902 |
APDQ | |||
Enjoyment | 0.023 | −0.13 to 0.176 | 0.768 |
Security | −0.079 | −0.209 to 0.05 | 0.231 |
Acceptance | 0.067 | −0.062 to 0.196 | 0.312 |
Purpose | −0.087 | −0.28 to 0.1 | 0.388 |
Enthusiasm | 0.031 | −0.178 to 0.24 | 0.772 |
SF-36 | |||
Physical health | −1.85 | −3.702 to 0.003 | 0.05 |
Mental health | −0.709 | −2.962 to 1.544 | 0.537 |
Test for difference in number of zero event shifts between baseline implementation and outcome periods.
Positive figures represent increases or improvements on the experimental wards, negative figures increases or improvements on the control wards.