TOPIC AREA: Patient Specimen Identification
Practice: Barcoding Systems
| Practice: Bar Coding Systems |
Study Quality Rating | Effect Size Rating | Overall Consistency |
Overall Strength of Body of Evidence |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | Practice | Measures | Results | Total | Rating | ||||
|
| |||||||||
| Published | |||||||||
| Bologna 2002 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | Fair | Moderate | 5 Studies = Good/Substantial | |
| Brown 2010 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | Good | Substantial | ||
| Fabretti 2011 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | Poor | N/A | ||
| Hayden. 2008 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | Good | Substantial | 2 Studies = Fair/Substantial | |
| Hill 2010 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | Good | Substantial | ||
| Killeen 2005 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | Good | Substantial | 1 Study = Good/Moderate | |
| Morrison 2010 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | Fair | Moderate | ||
| Sandler 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | Poor | N/A | 2 Studies = Fair/Moderate | |
| Turner 2003 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | Poor | N/A | ||
| Zarbo 2009 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | Good | Substantial | 4 Studies = Poor - Excluded | |
| Unpublished | |||||||||
| LBJ 2009 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | Good | Moderate | ||
| U of MN 2009 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | Poor | N/A | ||
| U of WA* | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | Fair | Substantial | ||
| Unpub A 2009 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | Fair | Substantial | ||
| *not in meta- analysis | Yes | High | |||||||