TOPIC AREA: Patient Specimen Identification
Practice: Point-of-Care Test Barcoding
| Practice: POCT Bar Coding Systems |
Study Quality Rating | Effect Size Rating |
Overall Consistency |
Overall Strength of Body of Evidence |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | Practice | Measures | Results | Total | Rating | ||||
|
| |||||||||
| Colard 2005 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | Good | Substantial | ||
| Nichols et. al 2004 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | Poor | N/A | ||
| Rao et al. 2005 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | Fair | Moderate | 5 Studies = Good/Substantial | |
| Unpublished | |||||||||
| Geisinger 2009 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | Fair | Substantial | 1 Study = Fair/Substantial | |
| Kenmore Mercy | |||||||||
| Hospital 2011 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | Good | Substantial | 1 Study – Fair/Moderate | |
| Mercy Hospital of | |||||||||
| Buffalo 2011 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | Good | Substantial | 2 Studies = Poor- Excluded | |
| Sisters of Charity | |||||||||
| Hospital Buffalo 2011 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | Good | Substantial | ||
| Sisters of Charity | |||||||||
| Hosp. St. Joseph 2011 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | Good | Substantial | ||
| Unpub B 2009 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | Poor | N/A | Yes | High |