Table 1.
Comparison of the induction capacity of S. aureus strain 1027 vs. N305 in different stimulation media
| Group | Gene | SM0 | SM10 | SM milk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | TNF | 3.33a ± 0.08 | 1.33 ± 0.23 | 0.88 ± 0.03 |
| IL6 | 3.85 ± 0.27 | 1.09 ± 0.08 | 1.16 ± 0.31 | |
| IL1A | 2.17 ± 0.77 | 1.02 ± 0.17 | 1.45 ± 0.25 | |
| IL1B | 4.17 ± 0.80 | 1.18 ± 0.01 | 0.68 ± 0.06 | |
| CXCL8 | 2.17 ± 0.25 | 1.06 ± 0.11 | 1.64 ± 0.20 | |
| CCL20 | 4.76 ± 0.95 | 0.75 ± 0.05 | 1.06 ± 0.12 | |
| B | NOS2A | 3.70 ± 0.53 | 1.10 ± 0.11 | 0.99 ± 0.07 |
| LAP | 2.78 ± 0.25 | 1.02 ± 0.38 | 0.89 ± 0.03 | |
| SAA3 | 1.72 ± 0.07 | 1.09 ± 0.42 | 0.79 ± 0.13 |
aRatio of the maximum fold change induced by strain 1027 vs. N305; mean value ± SEM form two biological replica, each assayed in duplicate