Table 6.

Patient satisfaction on technical effectiveness of AHTs

	$\overline{X}\pm S$	(U) χ 2	p*
Gender
Male	4.04 ± 0.66	56390.500	0.756
Female	4.06 ± 0.65
Age (year)
<20	4.02 ± 0.68	2.981	0.395
20-39	4.00 ± 0.71
40-59	4.13 ± 0.59
≥60	4.05 ± 0.62
Level of education
≤Junior high school	4.03 ± 0.65	5.646	0.130
Senior high (vocational) school	4.02 ± 0.68
Associate degree	4.16 ± 0.69
≥Bachelor degree	4.23 ± 0.60
Annual household income (yuan)
<10000	3.98 ± 0.62	14.401	0.002
10000-29999	3.99 ± 0.67
30000-49999	4.02 ± 0.64
≥50000	4.20 ± 0.67
Area of servicesa
(1) Public health	4.02 ± 0.75	31.452	0.000
(2) Maternal and child care	3.84 ± 0.69
(3) Traditional Chinese medicine	4.16 ± 0.58
(4) Family planning	4.11 ± 0.61
(5) Management of chronic conditions	4.17 ± 0.63
Insurance coverage
No	3.82 ± 0.64	13635.500	0.003
Yes	4.07 ± 0.65

*Mann–Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis H test

^aNemenyi Post Hoc tests found statistical significance (p < 0.05): (2) vs (3); (2) vs (4); (2) vs (5)