Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Viral Hepat. 2014 Jul 10;22(2):175–183. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12278

Table 2.

Utilities and costs

Model parameters Base-case value (Range) Distribution Reference
Utility weights
  F0–F3 0.904 (0.723–1) Beta [20]
  SVR after F0–F3 fibrosis 0.912 (0.730–1) Beta [21]
  F4 0.877 (0.702–1) Beta [20]
  SVR after F4 0.912 (0.730–1) Beta [20]
  Decompensated cirrhosis 0.848 (0.678–1) Beta [20]
  HCC 0.867 (0.694–1) Beta [20]
  Liver transplant 0.852 (0.682–1) Beta [20]
  After liver transplant 0.910 (0.728–1) Beta [20]
  DT annualized decrement 0.029 (0.023–0.035) Beta [7]
  TT annualized decrement 0.044 (0.035–0.052) Beta [7]
Cost (2013 €)
  F0–F3 522 (±20%) Gamma [30]
  SVR after F0–F3 fibrosis 0 Assumption
  F4 1512 (±20%) Gamma Assumption
  SVR after F4 1512 (±20%) Gamma [31]
  Decompensated cirrhosis 6350 (±20%) Gamma [31]
  HCC 12 744 (±20%) Gamma [31]
  Liver transplant 90 986 (±20%) Gamma [8]
  After liver transplant 17 612 (±20%) Gamma [30]
  IL-28B testing 67 [23]

F0, Metavir fibrosis stage 0; F1, Metavir fibrosis stage 1; F2, Metavir fibrosis stage 2; F3, Metavir fibrosis stage 3; F4, Metavir fibrosis stage 4; SVR, sustained virologic respond; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; DT, dual therapy; TT, triple therapy.