Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Behav. 2014 Apr 21;136:121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.04.025

Table 2. Relation to food intake and BOLD response to food stimuli.

Food intake measure/study design Food stimuli during scan Relation to BOLD response during food image exposure
Ad lib milkshake consumption (post-scan) Milkshake receipt > tasteless solution receipt Response in midbrain and medial OFC was positively predicted subsequent ad lib milkshake intake [64]
Ad lib snack consumption (post-scan) Food images > images of non-food household items Response in ventral striatum was positively related to ad lib snack intake [65]
Doubly-labeled water estimates of two-week energy intake Cues predicting milkshake receipt > cues predicting tasteless solution receipt Response in the visual and anterior cingulate cortices, precuneus, primary gustatory cortex (frontal operculum) and striatum was positively related to energy intake [66]
Ad lib meal consumption (post-scan) Appetizing food images > non-food objects Ad libitum meal intake was related to decreased dorsolateral prefrontal cortex response [86]
Comparison of habitual soft drink consumers vs. BMI-matched controls Soft drink brand advertisements > non-food advertisements Response in the precuneus was greater in habitual soft drink consumers [67]
Self-reported artificial sweetener use in habitual diet soft drink consumers Saccharin solution receipt > tasteless solution receipt Artificial sweetener use was related to decreased striatal response [68]
Self-reported artificial sweetener use Sucrose solution receipt > tasteless solution receipt Artificial sweetener use was related decreased response in the insula and amygdala [69]
Self-reported intake of ice cream and frozen dessert Milkshake receipt > tasteless solution receipt Frequency of ice cream intake was related to decreased ventral striatum, insula and ventromedial prefrontal cortex [70]