Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 1;25(7):760–768. doi: 10.1089/thy.2014.0502

Table 1.

Estimated Likelihood of Malignancy in a Thyroid Nodule with Indeterminate Cytology and Recommended Management

Bethesda cytologic category Ancillary testing Estimatedarisk of malignancy; range (median) Recommendation
III (AUS/FLUS) None 6–48% (14%) Repeat FNA, ancillary testing, or diagnostic lobectomy
  GECb (reported prevalence 24%) Suspicious 38% Diagnostic lobectomy
    Benign 5% Active surveillance
  7-gene MTc (reported prevalence 14%) Positive 88% Oncologic thyroidectomy
    Negative 6% Active surveillance or diagnostic lobectomy
IV (FN/FL) None 14–34% (25%) Ancillary testing or diagnostic lobectomy
  GECb (reported prevalence 25%) Suspicious 37% Diagnostic lobectomy
    Benign 6% Active surveillance
  7-gene MTc (reported prevalence 27%) Positive 87% Oncologic thyroidectomy
    Negative 14% Diagnostic lobectomy
  ThyroSeq2.0 paneld (reported prevalence 27%) Positive 87% Oncologic thyroidectomy
    Negative 5% Observation
V (SMC) None 53–87% (70%) Ancillary testing or oncologic thyroidectomy
  GECb (reported prevalence 62%) Suspicious 76% Oncologic thyroidectomy
    Benign 15% Diagnostic lobectomy
  7-gene MTc (reported prevalence 54%) Positive 95% Oncologic thyroidectomy
    Negative 28% Diagnostic lobectomy
a

Estimated risk based upon reported studies that used Bethesda classification. Estimates are highly dependent on the prevalence of disease in a given population. Thus, if the prevalence of malignancy in a category of indeterminate cytology is higher than disease prevalence reported in the referenced studies above, then the estimated likelihood of malignancy would be higher. Sonographic and clinical factors may also significantly affect these estimates in individual patients.

b

GEC, gene expression classifier, data as reported by Alexander et al. (21).

c

7-gene MT, seven-gene mutational panel, data as reported by Nikiforov et al. (30).

d

ThyroSeq2.0 panel, data as reported by Nikiforov et al. (36).