Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 29;10(7):e0133270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133270

Table 3. Comparison of the inter-individual variations and minimal sample sizes of the urinary and CSF proteomes between this study and previous studies.

Quantification method Inter-individual variation Minimal sample size (2-fold)
Urine Nagaraj et al.[11] Label-free 66% 16
Liu et al.[1] Spectrum counting 71% 18
Our study iTRAQ 26.20% 5
CSF Stoop et al.[13] Label-free 42% 8
Perrin et al.[15] Label-free 55% 12
Our study iTRAQ 18.30% 4