Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 30;6:1091. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01091

Table 3A.

Effects of treatment on attention, inhibition, and switching.

Testing 1 Testing 2* Testing 3** Testing 4***
Selective and sustained attention (Bells, Italian norms in Biancardi and Stoppa, 1997) analyzed with standard scores (chronological age norms)
Number of targets identified in the first 30 s −1.5 −0.46 −0.52 0.46
Number of targets identified in 240 s −4.5 −1.59 −0.15 −0.31
Inhibition (Korkman et al., 2007) analyzed with percentile ranks and standard scores (chronological age norms)
Errors—Percentile ranks < 2 (raw score: 7) < 2 (raw score: 8) >75 (raw score: 0) >75 (raw score: 0)
Completion time—Standard scores −2.6 (raw score: 106) −2 (raw score: 81) −1.33 (raw score: 70) −1.33 (raw score: 69)
Switching (Korkman et al., 2007) analyzed with percentile ranks and standard scores (chronological age norms)
Errors—Percentile ranks < 2 (raw score: 46) < 2 (raw score: 26) < 2 (raw score: 13) Between the 11th and the 25th percentile rank (raw score: 9)
Completion time—Standardized scores 1.33 (raw score: 59) −2 (raw score: 118) −2.6 (raw score: 175) −2.6 (raw score: 157)
*

After 10 weeks of home treatment with Feuerstein activities;

**

after 10 weeks of the cognitive training program added to the home treatment;

***

after further 10 weeks of the cognitive training added to the home treatment.