Table 3.
Sample 1 vs. Sample 2 | Up a | Down b | Total | Shared | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRRh vs. WRRl | 116 (47) | 84 (24) | 200 (71) | 80 (22) | 26 (16) |
XHh vs. XHl | 129 (44) | 150 (40) | 279 (84) | ||
WRRh vs. XHh | 130 (31) | 127 (47) | 257 (78) | 110 (39) | |
WRR vs. XHl | 137 (41) | 160 (60) | 297 (101) |
a The numbers of miRNAs expressed in sample 1 more than sample 2; b The numbers of miRNAs expressed in sample 1 were lower than sample 2. The value in brackets is the number of novel miRNAs. WRRh vs. WRRl indicated the comparison between the two-tail samples of Recessive White Rock; XHh vs. XHl indicated the comparison between the two-tail samples of Xinhua Chickens; WRRh vs XHh indicated the comparison between the groups of Recessive White Rock and Xinhua Chickens with high body weight; WRRl vs. XHl indicated the comparison between the groups of Recessive White Rock and Xinhua Chickens with low body weight.