Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Aug;79(2):282–288. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000732

Table 2.

Association between characteristics of patients with acute appendicitis treated at 122 University HealthSystems Consortium Hospitals and operative interventions. (N=2,565)

Patient
Characteristics
Open
appendectomy,
N = 390
Laparoscopic
appendectomy,
N = 1867
IR drain
only,
N =48
No
intervention,
N = 256
p value*
Female 170 (43.6) 855 (45.8) 19 (39.6) 110 (43) 0.6188
Age (years) <.0001
18-25, N (%) 62 (15.9) 466 (25) 12 (25) 43 (16.8)
26-45, N (%) 128 (32.8) 739 (39.6) 13 (27.1) 75 (29.3)
46-65, N (%) 153 (39.2) 503 (26.9) 16 (33.3) 97 (37.9)
66-85, N (%) 41 (10.5) 146 (7.8) 7 (14.6) 35 (13.7)
>85, N (%) 6 (1.5) 13 (0.7) 0 6 (2.3)
Race 0.0963
White, N (%) 263 (67.4) 1210 (64.8) 32 (66.7) 150 (58.6)
Black, N (%) 37 (9.5) 203 (10.9) 6 (12.5) 42 (16.4)
Hispanic, N (%) 61 (15.6) 310 (16.6) 5 (10.4) 49 (19.1)
Asian, N (%) 12 (3.1) 89 (4.8) 2 (4.2) 10 (3.9)
Other, N (%) 17 (4.4) 55 (2.9) 3 (6.3) 5 (2)
Insurance <.0001
Private, N (%) 160 (41) 973 (52.1) 16 (33.3) 104 (40.6)
Medicaid, N (%) 57 (14.6) 270 (14.5) 8 (16.7) 43 (16.8)
Medicare, N (%) 63 (16.2) 193 (10.3) 8 (16.7) 53 (20.7)
Other Government,
N (%)
10 (2.6) 32 (1.7) 3 (6.3) 4 (1.6)
Other, N (%) 31 (7.9) 125 (6.7) 4 (8.3) 16 (6.3)
Uninsured, N (%) 69 (17.7) 274 (14.7) 9 (18.8) 36 (14.1)
Severity of Illness <.0001^^
Minor, N (%) 165 (42.3) 1090 (58.4) 0 48 (18.8)
Moderate, N (%) 190 (48.7) 714 (38.2) 48 (100) 188 (73.4)
Major, N (%) 30 (7.7) 61 (3.3) 0 18 (7)
Extreme, N (%) 5 (1.3) 2 (0.1) 0 2 (0.8)
Type of EGS** model <.0001
ACS** 166 (42.6) 1072 (57.4) 29 (60.4) 144 (56.3)
GSOC** 224 (57.4) 795 (42.6) 19 (39.6) 112 (43.8)
*

Pearson chi-squared test of association or non-parametric tests of comparison of medians or t-tests for means

**

EGS = emergency general surgery; ACS = acute care surgery; GSOC = general surgeon on call

^^

P-value for severity of illness comparison is based on three groups (Open appendectomy, Laparoscopic appendectomy, and none) due to lack of frequencies on IR-drain only group.

-Note that 4 frequencies are missing for this table N=2561, lap+IR (2) and open+IR (2).