Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Theor Comput Chem. 2014 Apr 8;13(3):1440006. doi: 10.1142/S0219633614400069

Table 2.

Examples of two proteins and two small molecules for which optimal vdW and MS based dielectric boundary definitions yield equally accurate PB estimates of ΔGel, kcal/mol. The vdW DB calculations are based on BONDI + 0.2 Å atomic radii. For the proteins the standard value of ρw = 1.4 Å was used to compute the MS. Since, in the case of the small molecules and MS DB, the 3 common radii sets did no yield an optimal agreement with the explicit solvent for any solvent probe radius ρw < 7 Å, fig. 6, we increased all the atomic radii slightly to reach the optimum at a reasonable ρw. Specifically, a uniform scaling (multiplication) of all the radii in the BONDI set by 1.096 gave a clear minimum at ρw = 3 Å in the PB vs. explicit solvent ΔGel average error curve (graph not shown); here we used this value of ρw to define MS for the PB calculations on small molecules.

Structure class small protein small protein small molecule small molecule
Name 1BH4 1BRV 3-methyl-1h-indole 1-naphthol
Number of atoms 427 265 19 19
ΔGel, PB vdW −237.9 −210.0 −7.5 −8.0
ΔGel, PB MS −240.9 −213.4 −7.4 −8.1
ΔGel, TIP3P −239.7 −206.7 −7.5 −8.3