Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 2;54(29):4555–4564. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00591

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Free energy profiles for ScOMPDC-catalyzed decarboxylation of FOMP (Scheme 5), drawn for reactions at [S] ≪ Km using the kinetic parameters from Table 2. (A) Decarboxylation of FOMP catalyzed by wild-type OMPDC, which shows (a) the similar barriers to partitioning of EO·FOMP between dissociation of OMP and the enzyme conformational change to form EC·FOMP (k–dkc),27 (b) thermodynamically favorable conversion of EO·FOMP to the EC·FOMP caged complex,19 and (c) the ≈3.5 kcal/mol difference [RT ln(390/1.1) (Scheme 2)] between the barriers for formation of EC·FOMP and decarboxylation of EC·FOMP. (B) Decarboxylation of FOMP catalyzed by the Q215A/R235A mutant of ScOMPDC. This mutation results in a 106-fold decrease in Kc for loop closure compared with that of wild-type ScOMPDC, but in little change in intrinsic barrier Λ for loop closure (Table 2). The decarboxylation step is rate-determining because k–c > kchem. (C) Decarboxylation of FOMP catalyzed by the Y217A mutant of ScOMPDC. This mutation results in a 2000-fold decrease in Kc for loop closure and a large increase in intrinsic barrier Λ for slow loop closure (Table 2), so that loop closure is rate-determining for this decarboxylation reaction.