Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2015 Jul 9;12(3):449–461. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.023

Figure 7. Effects of apamin treatment on fear conditioning in WT and AS mice.

Figure 7

(A) % freezing for different experimental groups in context memory (means ± S.E.M. of 16-20 mice; ***p <0.001, as compared to WT controls; #p <0.05, as compared to vehicle-treated AS mice; two-way ANOVA with Newman-Keuls post-hoc analysis).

(B) Cumulative distribution of % freezing in WT and AS mice treated with vehicle or apamin assessed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test in context memory (***p <0.001, as compared to WT controls, #p <0.05, as compared to vehicle-treated AS mice).

(C,D) % freezing and cumulative distribution for different experimental groups in tone memory (means ± S.E.M. of 9-11 mice. *p <0.05 and **p <0.01 as compared to WT controls; #p <0.05, as compared to vehicle-treated AS mice). See also Figure S7.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure