Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Pathol. 2014 Jul 22;67(11):955–960. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202290

Table 2.

Percent of pathologist who report they would seek a second opinion by diagnosis category and second opinion policy. (n = 252 Pathologists)

Percent of actual cases with second opinion by diagnostic category Policy in Place
Yes No
n col % row % n col % row %
Negative (benign)
    0% 1 1.2 1.6 60 35.3 98.4
    >0-50% 6 7.3 5.5 104 61.2 94.5
    >50-<100% 2 2.4 50.0 2 1.2 50.0
    100% 73 89.0 94.8 4 2.4 5.2
    Total (n) 82 100.0 32.5 170 100.0 67.5
ADH
    0% 1 1.1 3.7 26 16.1 96.3
    >0-50% 0 0.0 0.0 53 32.9 100.0
    >50-<100% 2 2.2 5.1 37 23.0 94.9
    100% 88 96.7 66.2 45 28.0 33.8
    Total (n) 91 100.0 36.1 161 100.0 63.9
DCIS
    0% 1 0.7 4.3 22 20.0 95.7
    >0-50% 2 1.4 3.3 58 52.7 96.7
    >50-<100% 5 3.5 21.7 18 16.4 78.3
    100% 134 94.4 91.8 12 10.9 8.2
    Total (n) 142 100.0 56.3 110 100.0 43.7
Invasive
    0% 1 0.6 5.0 19 21.6 95.0
    >0-50% 4 2.4 7.1 52 59.1 92.9
    >50-<100% 9 5.5 47.4 10 11.4 52.6
    100% 150 91.5 95.5 7 8.0 4.5
    Total (n) 164 100.0 65.1 88 100.0 34.9
At least one above§
    0% 1 0.6 5.9 16 18.8 94.1
    >0-50% 0 0.0 0.0 34 40.0 100.0
    >50-<100% 9 5.4 32.1 19 22.4 67.9
    100% 157 94.0 90.8 16 18.8 9.2
    Total (n) 167 100.0 66.3 85 100.0 33.7

Note: Row percentages might not add up to 100 due to rounding.

* Pathologists reported the % of their breast caseload by primary diagnosis for which they usually obtain a second opinion.

Policy was dichotomized to NO (which include the Unknowns and 0%) and YES (% reported >0)

§

One or more second option policies; actual practice is maximum % of cases in any 4 diagnostic groups