Table 3.

Linear regression analyses examining the relationship of mental health with moderate-to-vigorous activity (MVPA) (minutes/day) and sedentary behaviour (% of wear time)

Ln(MVPA)	Ratio	95 % CI	p-value
Crude model
Good well-being vs depressed mood	1.72	0.99 – 2.99	0.06
Many worries (ref)	1.00
Some worries	1.27	0.72 – 2.23	0.40
No or few worries	1.18	0.64 – 2.19	0.59
Model 1
Good well-being vs depressed mood	1.70	1.02 – 2.82	0.04
Many worries (ref)	1.00
Some worries	0.97	0.58 – 1.62	0.89
No or few worries	0.92	0.52 – 1.61	0.77
Model 2
Good well-being vs depressed mood	1.85	1.06 – 3.24	0.03
Many worries (ref)	1.00
Some worries	0.94	0.55 – 1.61	0.83
No or few worries	1.01	0.57 – 1.80	0.97
Sedentary behaviour	Difference	95 % CI	p-value
Crude model
Good well-being vs depressed mood	−16.82	−60.76 – 27.13	0.45
Many worries (ref)	0
Some worries	8.05	−35.78 – 51.89	0.72
No or few worries	−18.62	−66.52 – 29.27	0.44
Model 1
Good well-being vs depressed mood	−18.94	−63.95 – 26.08	0.41
Many worries (ref)	0
Some worries	4.88	−40.01 – 49.76	0.83
No or few worries	−16.17	−64.86 – 32.51	0.51
Model 2
Good well-being vs depressed mood	−36.24	−85.07 – 12.60	0.14
Many worries (ref)	0
Some worries	1.70	−43.34 – 46.74	0.94
No or few worries	−13.43	−62.25 – 35.39	0.59

Model 1: Corrected for BMI, smoking behaviour, and alcohol consumption

Model 2: Corrected for BMI, smoking behaviour, alcohol consumption, attitude weight, attitude physical activity, self-efficacy, social support and outcome expectancies

Bold font indicates statistically significant associations (p< 0.05).