Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 28;5(7):e007195. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007195

Table 2.

Follow-up studies to develop and validate the FINDRISC questionnaire for predicting risk of incident diabetes mellitus

Study Country Age Sample characteristics N Se Sp NPV Hosmer- Lemeshow AUC Gold standard
Alssema (2008)47* The Netherlands 28–75 From Hoorn, and PREVEND studies 2439; 3345 84 (cut-off≥7)
52 (cut-off≥10)
42 (cut-off≥7)
76 (cut-off≥10)
94 (cut-off≥7
91 (cut-off≥10)
0.71 OGTT, FPG
Alssema (2011)48 The Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, The UK, Australia, Mauritius 46–60 Data pooling from DETECT-2 project 18 301 76 63 p=0.27 0.77 OGTT and self reported
Lindström and Tuomilehto 26 Finland 45–64 Random sample from National Population Register in 1987 and 1992 4746; 4615 78 (cut-off≥9) 77 (cut-off≥9) 0.99 0.85 OGTT, FPG, diabetes drugs
Bergmann et al33 Germany 41–79 Participants with increased risk of T2DM 526 73 (cut-off≥9) 67 (cut-off≥9) 0.77 OGTT
Soriguer et al41 46 Spain 18–65 66.9% under 45 years old 714 0.96 (cut-off≥9) 0.75 OGTT

*Modified FINDRISC (age, BMI, waist circumference, use of antihypertensive drugs, parental history of diabetes, family history of diabetes in first degree relative).

†Modified FINDRISC (age, BMI, waist circumference, use of antihypertensive drugs, history of gestational diabetes, sex, smoking, family history of diabetes).

‡Modified FINDRISC (only 6 variables. diet and physical activity were excluded). Sensitivity and specificity calculated from population without intervention programme.

AUC, area under curve; BMI body mass index; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; NPV, negative predictive value; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity, T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.