Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Glob Public Health. 2015 Feb 2;10(9):1032–1045. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.1003572

Table 4.

Associations of network stigma with alters' social-demographic and network characteristics, analysed with Generalized Estimating Equations.

PLWHAs' alters (N=940) Caregivers' alters (N=990)


OR 95% CI P Value OR 95% CI P Value
Sex
(ref: male)
0.93 (0.70, 1.25) 0.65 0.96 (0.76, 1.21) 0.72
Age
(ref: >45)
 <25 1.04 (0.50, 2.16) 0.92 1.23 (0.72, 2.11) 0.45
 26–35 1.07 (0.69, 1.68) 0.76 1.00 (0.68, 1.47) 0.99
 36–45 1.32 (0.89, 1.94) 0.17 1.18 (0.80, 1.75) 0.40
Education
(ref: high school)
 Elementary School or less 1.02 (0.56, 1.86) 0.94 1.03 (0.65, 1.61) 0.91
 Middle School 1.25 (0.86, 1.82) 0.24 1.08 (0.78, 1.50) 0.63
Marital Status
(ref: married)
0.83 (0.54, 1.29) 0.41 0.49 (0.30, 0.78) <0.01
Relation
(ref: friends)
 Spouse 0.07 (0.02, 0.21) <0.01 0.07 (0.03, 0.17) <0.01
 Other family 0.22 (0.14, 0.37) <0.01 0.14 (0.09, 0.22) <0.01
 Others 1.70 (0.91, 3.17) 0.10 1.05 (0.70, 1.58) 0.81
Network Density 0.07 (0.01, 0.52) 0.01 1.27 (0.20, 8.14) 0.80
Length of Relationship with Egos
(ref: 3 years or less)
More than 3 years 1.22 (0.56, 2.65) 0.62 0.88 (0.54, 1.44) 0.61
Contact Frequency with Egos
(ref: daily)
 Few times/week 1.01 (0.59, 1.71) 0.98 1.28 (0.74, 2.20) 0.38
 Few times/month 1.11 (0.66, 1.87) 0.70 1.69 (1.08, 2.64) 0.02
 Less than monthly 1.30 (0.69, 2.46) 0.41 3.11 (1.70, 5.67) <0.01