TABLE V.
Comparison of previously published energy efficient and/or low power transmitters.
Reference | Frequency | Data rate |
Pout | Energy/bit | Standby power |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[MHz] | [Mbps] | [dBm] | [pJ] | [pW] | |
[5] | 900 | 5 | −10 | 140 | _* |
[15] | 400 | 0.12 | −16 | 2900 | _* |
[16] | 400 | 0.8 | −4.5 | < 14,400 | ≈20,000 |
[17] | 1900 | 0.33 | 0.8 | 4050 | _* |
[18] | 433 | 3/10 | −12.7 | 187/52 | _* |
[19] | 900 | 1 | −11.4 | 3800 | _* |
[20] | 2400 | 1/10 | −10 | 483/48 | _* |
[21] | 2400 | 0.042 | −45 | 29,000 | < 675 |
[22] | 570/690 | 10 | −10 | 4700 | 3,300 |
[36] | 9800 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 747 | 170 |
This work | 2400 | 5 | > −29 | 38 | 39.7 |
Most transmitter publications do not report standby/leakage power.