Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Ethnopharmacol. 2015 Jun 18;172:247–253. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.06.013

Table 1.

SFPS induced production of various cytokines and chemokines via the TLR4 signaling pathway.

TNF-α (ng/mL)
No inhibitors + PMB + CLI
No treatment 0.47 ± 0.02
LPSa 139.35 ± 9.92 3.52 ± 0.85*** 0.12 ± 0.01***
SFPS (μg/mL) 12.5 2.79 ± 1.51 1.57 ± 0.66 0.15 ± 0.03
50 13.07 ± 3.85 2.50 ± 1.00 0.27 ± 0.01***
200 43.65 ± 10.40 8.13 ± 1.21*** 1.55 ± 0.06***
IL-6 (ng/mL)
No inhibitors + PMB + CLI
No treatment <0.01b
LPSa 54.41 ± 3.71 <0.12b <0.12b
SFPS (μg/mL) 12.5 <0.12b <0.12b <0.12b
50 0.18 ± 0.01 <0.12b <0.12b
200 6.31 ± 1.75 <0.12b <0.12b
G-CSF (ng/mL)
No inhibitors + PMB + CLI
No treatment 0.90 ± 0.11
LPSa 754.94 ± 28.24 14.35 ± 7.20*** <0.14
SFPS (μg/mL) 12.5 1.95 ± 0.59 0.15 ± 0.00 2.43 ± 3.01
50 44.19 ± 8.18 0.17 ± 0.00 2.70 ± 1.74
200 459.60 ± 91.03 0.61 ± 0.12*** 29.46 ± 7.52***
MIP-1α (ng/mL)
No inhibitors + PMB + CLI
No treatment >21.76b,c
LPSa 1002.19 ± 15.82 76.77 ± 23.64*** 11.68 ± 1.44***
SFPS (μg/mL) 12.5 55.71 ± 7.28 31.71 ± 7.51 12.56 ± 1.74
50 250.64 ± 24.26 37.67 ± 6.29 16.29 ± 1.24
200 816.70 ± 58.49 160.79 ± 9.00 31.86 ± 2.22*
MIP-1β (ng/mL)
No inhibitors + PMB + CLI
No treatment 15.71 ± 0.80
LPSa 806.20 ± 125.22 45.01 ± 15.22*** 7.65 ± 0.98***
SFPS (μg/mL) 12.5 54.61 ± 25.14 26.79 ± 8.83 8.79 ± 1.34
50 245.62 ± 47.17 38.72 ± 14.71* 12.5 ± 0.90*
200 497.67 ± 46.91 160.08 ± 20.74*** 25.21 ± 1.50***
MIP-2 (ng/mL)
No inhibitors + PMB + CLI
No treatment >19.78b,c
LPSa >988.86 b 66.70 ± 19.93 0.62 ± 0.04
SFPS (μg/mL) 12.5 19.45 ± 5.94 14.70 ± 7.49 1.36 ± 0.74
50 107.34 ± 12.51 23.98 ± 8.72 0.68 ± 0.01
200 612.22 ± 108.22 88.55 ± 35.64 1.58 ± 0.44

Data are expressed as means ± standard error of mean (n = 4). Comparisons between no inhibitors values to either stimuli (i.e., LPS or SFPS).

*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01;

***

p<0.001.

a

Ultrapure LPS from E. coli 0111:B4 used at 100 ng/mL was used as a positive control and to confirm the effectiveness of both inhibitors.

b

The concentrations were either lower or higher than the detection ranges of the kit.

c

These concentrations are higher than the detection range, however, they are lower than some of data from other treatment, this is because of different dilution factors (control: 2-fold dilution, LPS: 100-fold dilution, SFPS: 10-fold dilution).