Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 18;23(13):16866–16883. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.016866

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

2D Gaussian profile results: difference d(x0) between the median of the x0 estimates and the true value x0 (left-hand side plots), and percentage difference δ (x0) between the standard deviation (with respect to the median) of the x0 estimates and the PLAM for x0 (right-hand side plots), as functions of the PIF used to integrate the image profile during estimation. For each scenario of Table 1, results are shown for a 63× (cyan⋄) and a 100× (red○) data set, simulated at PIF = 13 using the 2D Gaussian profile with parameters given in Section 4. Each data set is fitted with a 2D Gaussian profile by an ML estimator, with PIF values ranging from 0 to 13. In all plots the horizontal line denotes 0, and the inset shows the results for PIF 3.