Table 1.
Key Points for Dry Endoscopic-Assisted Mini-Open Hamstring Repair
Indications |
Chronic hamstring origin tears |
Ischial tunnel syndrome |
Advantages |
The surgeon can view the pathologic area under magnification. |
The technique is less technically demanding than full-endoscopic approaches. |
Accurate anchor placement can be achieved. |
A lesser trochanterplasty for concomitant ischiofemoral impingement can be performed. |
The risk of wound infection is theoretically lower than that with full-open procedures and comparable with full-endoscopic techniques. |
The sciatic nerve can be protected under direct visualization. |
Sciatic nerve decompression can be achieved. |
There is no risk of unrecognized fluid extravasation. |
Disadvantages |
Large retracted tears might not be able to be addressed. |
Theoretical risks |
Wound infection |
Retear |
Nerve damage |
Vascular damage |
Nonaesthetic scar |
Tips and pearls |
Accurate diagnosis of hamstring origin tears should be made through a comprehensive history, physical examination, and radiologic evaluation. |
The surgeon should ensure that the injury can be addressed with the mini-open technique. |
A concomitant diagnosis of ischiofemoral impingement should be defined before surgery. |
Neurophysiological monitoring should be used. |
The incision should be guided by fluoroscopy. |
The incision should travel superolaterally to inferomedially to have a better attack angle for anchor placement. |
A hermetic dressing should be used because the incision is close to the perianal zone. |
Pitfalls |
Failure to diagnose concomitant ischiofemoral impingement |
Failure to accurately identify hamstring proximal attachment site |
Under-tensioning of repair |
Use of technique for large tears including those of myotendinous junction |