Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 4;6:1099. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01099

Table 3.

Effect sizes on post-test means adjusted for pretest, reading and random effects.

1 vs. 4 2 vs. 4 3 vs. 4 1 vs. 3 2 vs. 3 1 vs. 2
MD-LWM
CMAT 0.08 0.22 −0.10 0.15 0.27 −0.14
Visual-Span 0.42 0.92 0.36 0.06 0.55 −0.48
Oper-Span 0.01 −0.25 −0.14 0.13 −0.11 0.22
MD-HWM
CMAT 0.70 0.07 0.44 0.19 −0.28 0.43
Visual-Span 0.26 0.69 3.89 −1.52 −1.47 −0.30
Oper-Span 0.03 −0.07 1.27 −1.51 −1.81 0.12
NMD-LWM
CMAT −0.11 −1.00 −0.53 0.44 −0.35 0.94
Visual-Span −0.18 0.85 −0.16 −0.04 0.89 −0.80
Oper-Span −0.36 −0.20 0.53 −0.98 −0.74 −0.18
NMD-HWM
CMAT 0.47 0.33 0.36 0.16 0.04 0.08
Visual-Span 0.88 1.25 0.31 0.60 0.97 −0.31
Oper-Span 0.06 0.02 0.03 0.03 −0.01 0.03

1, Verbal-emphasis Condition; 2, Verbal + Visual Condition; 3, Visual-emphasis Condition, and 4, Control. Bold positive ES reflects moderate (>0.50) to high ESs (>0.80) outcomes in favor of strategy conditions relative to control condition. CMAT, Comprehensive Math Abilities Test, Oper, Operation Span, Visual-span, Visual matrix span measure.