| Methods | Quasi‐RCT Length of follow‐up: 2 years |
|
| Participants | All children living in endemic area Number analysed for primary outcome: 1045 Age range: 1.5 to 3.5 years Inclusion criteria: children living in 32 randomly selected urban slums; registered with an Anganwadi worker (health worker); between 1.5 to 3.5 years of age Exclusion criteria: none stated |
|
| Interventions | Multiple doses vs placebo
|
|
| Outcomes |
Not included in review: prevalence of underweight and stunting over 2 years as defined by z‐scores, haemoglobin (visual colour estimation), stool examination (non‐concentration method), incidence of illness, and death |
|
| Notes | Location: Lucknow, India Community category: 3 Source of funding: International Clinical Epidemiology Network (INCLEN), Philadelphia, USA grant #2002‐94‐623 under the Clinical Economics Small Grants Program. |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | 32 Anganwadi centres randomly selected, and then children allocated to a serial number; those with odd or non‐zero ending numbers were assigned to placebo. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Not concealed. |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Single blind. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 9/610 children in the albendazole group and 7/451 in the placebo group were lost to follow‐up. Inclusion of all randomized participants (number evaluable/number randomized): 98% (1045/1061). |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All stated outcomes reported. |
| Other bias | Low risk | No other obvious source of bias. |