| Methods | Quasi‐RCT Length of follow‐up: 34 days |
|
| Participants | Infected children identified by screening Number analysed for primary outcome: 44 Age range: 1 to 5 years Inclusion criteria: 92 children 1 to 5 years from a community morbidity trial Exclusion criteria: none stated |
|
| Interventions | Single dose vs placebo
|
|
| Outcomes |
Not included in review: weight in % of Harvard standard; authors had intended to measure bicep and tricep skinfolds, but staff were unable to take these measurements |
|
| Notes | Location: Ethiopia Community category: 3 Freij 1979a and Freij 1979ai were reported in the same article. Source of funding: Semper Nutrition Fund, Stockholm; Swedish Medical Research Council. |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Quasi‐RCT: children matched into pairs of equal age and nutritional status. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details reported. |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Described as double blind, no further details reported. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 100% (44/44) of enrolled participants were evaluated. Inclusion of all randomized participants (number evaluable/number randomized): 100% (44/44). |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Trial authors had intended to measure bicep and tricep skinfolds, but staff were unable to take these measurements. |
| Other bias | Low risk | No obvious other source of bias. |