Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 23;2015(7):CD000371. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000371.pub6
Methods RCT
Length of follow‐up: 12 months
Participants All children living in endemic area
Number analysed for primary outcome: 330; mean age 8.3 years
Inclusion criteria: all primary school children in grades 1, 2, and 3 in 2 schools in slum areas in Indonesia; randomized according to Ascaris egg count and age
Exclusion criteria: children > 11; signs of puberty; signs of severe protein energy malnutrition
Interventions Multiple doses vs placebo
  1. Pyrantel pamoate: 10 mg/kg;

  2. Pyrantel pamoate: 10 mg/kg repeated at 6 months;

  3. Albendazole: 400 mg;

  4. Albendazole: 400 mg repeated at 6 months;

  5. Placebo.

Outcomes
  1. Stool (Kato‐Katz) prevalence and intensity;

  2. Weight;

  3. Height;

  4. MUAC;

  5. z‐scores: weight‐for‐age, height for age, weight‐for‐height, and MUAC.


Results of multivariate analysis using z‐scores presented and could not be used in meta‐analysis; unadjusted results not reported
Notes Location: Indonesia
Community category: 1
Placebo group showed an unexplained drop in egg counts at the 3‐month exam
Source of funding: Directorate of Higher Education, Department of Education and Culture, Government of Indonesia through Hibah Bersaing Project I & II. Albendazole and placebo provided by Smithkline Beecham Pharmaceuticals Indonesia. 
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomly assigned "by sex and egg count".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details reported.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk No details reported.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk 65% (330/507) of randomized participants were evaluated, number lost from each treatment group not reported. Inclusion of all randomized participants (number evaluable/number randomized): 65% (330/507).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All stated outcomes reported.
Other bias Low risk No obvious other source of bias.