Methods | Quasi‐RCT Length of follow‐up: 2 years |
|
Participants | All children living in endemic area Number analysed for primary outcome: 314 Mean age: 8 years Inclusion criteria: school children aged 8 who provided a stool sample Exclusion criteria: concurrent illness; anthelminth treatment in previous 3 months |
|
Interventions | Multiple doses vs placebo
|
|
Outcomes | Measured:
|
|
Notes | Location: Malaysia Community category: 1 No data used in meta‐analysis since SDs not provided Source of funding not reported. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Quasi‐randomized: block assignment design by school, then by sex, then by presence of worms as none, light, or moderate/heavy, and then by rank order of body weight in the group; used odd and even numbers; in urban area the odd numbered children were assigned to treatment; in the peri‐urban area the even numbered children were assigned to the treatment group. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details reported. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participants were blinded; trial staff not blinded to group assignment. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 89% (314/353) of randomized participants were evaluated. Inclusion of all randomized participants (number evaluable/number randomized): 89% (314/353). |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All stated outcomes reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | No obvious other sources of bias. |