Methods | RCT Length of follow‐up: 5 months |
|
Participants | All children living in endemic area Number analysed for primary outcome: 121 for nutritional outcomes Age range: 5 to 14 years Inclusion criteria: children from a school identified as having high prevalence of hookworm on the basis of a previous survey Exclusion criteria: children with height above 137 cm girls and 145 cm for boys since these were the upper limits in the reference ranges |
|
Interventions | Single dose vs placebo
|
|
Outcomes | Measured:
Reported:
|
|
Notes | Location: Botswana Community category: 1 Source of funding not reported. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "Random sample of half the children" were give the treatment and the remaining the placebo; no further details reported. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details reported. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No details reported. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 53% (121/228) of randomized participants were evaluated. Inclusion of all randomized participants (number evaluable/number randomized): 53% (121/228). |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Pre‐specfied outcomes reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | No obvious other sources of bias. |