Table 2. Means, Standard Deviations (SD), and Intercorrelations of the Scales That Measure Individual Differences in Cognitive Styles & Regret (N = 221).

Scale	Mean	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1. MI: Decision Difficulty	3.2	0.758
2. MI: Alternative Search	3.925	0.821	0.415
3. MI: Satisficing	4.86	0.49	0.042	0.18
4. REI: Rational	2.98	0.531	-0.233	0.021	0.226
5. REI: Experiential	2.294	0.577	-0.07	0.105	0.198	0.132
6. Intolerance of Ambiguity	3.068	0.48	0.198	0.194	-0.216	-0.346	-0.141
7. Need for Cognition	4.241	0.695	-0.172	0.007	0.154	0.745	0.145	-0.528
8. Objectivism	2.766	0.492	-0.076	0.279	0.154	0.535	-0.081	-0.02	0.358
9. Cognitive Reflection Task	1.49	1.003	-0.091	-0.088	0.08	0.104	0.042	-0.115	0.107	0.006
10. Regret	2.45	0.99	0.673	0.239	-0.156*	-0.366	-0.141	0.235	-0.281	-0.23	-0.06

Note: MI = Maximizing Inventory; REI = Rational-Experiential Inventory.

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Scale dimensions (higher numbers indicate more of an attribute): MI-Decision Difficulty (1 to 6); MI-Alternative Search (1 to 6); MI-Satisficing (1 to 6); REI-Rational (0 to 4); REI-Experiential (0 to 4); Intolerance of Ambiguity (1 to 6); Need for Cognition (1 to 6); Objectivism (1 to 5); Cognitive Reflection Task (0 to 3); Regret.

*Bonferroni adjustment was applied to the correlational analysis. The correlation between regret and satisficing tendency without the Bonferroni correction is significant at p = 0.0205.