Table 1. Properties of TEs significantly more expressed in the dysgenic germline by at last 2-fold (FDR<0.1).

TE	160:9 Abund. (Log 2)	160:9 piRNA (Log 2)	Expression: D (RPKM)	Expression: ND (RPKM)	PP pair density: D (pMM)	PP pair density: ND. (pMM)	TYPE
Helena	1.71	8.64	18.25	0.83	0.31	53.04	I
495	0.21	2.35	1.05	0.33	37.79	119.30	I
967	0.17	5.75	2.28	0.53	0.21	6.72	I
Penelope	4.95	5.30	61.48	25.42	11.19	32.06	I
Slicemaster	3.88	8.89	1.69	0.18	12.63	13.89	II
Skippy	1.64	2.50	321.77	2.65	74.92	47.03	III
Paris	1.67	5.50	18.94	9.36	12.22	6.25	III
Nausicaa	-0.06	2.24	86.90	4.43	14.19	44.83	IV
656	-0.01	7.25	3.20	1.07	0.34	13.46	IV
1012	-0.06	4.27	3.01	0.42	0.27	52.99	IV
190	-0.12	3.53	1.32	0.44	16.66	45.73	IV
620	-0.22	3.11	2.35	0.45	0.00	9.93	IV
938	-0.34	1.87	10.42	0.63	0.00	0.00	V
750	-0.30	0.03	28.03	1.54	7.17	12.84	VI

160:9 Abundance, 160:9 total piRNA, Expression: D (Dysgenic, RPKM), Expression: ND (Non-dysgenic, RPKM), Ping-pong pair density: D (Dysgenic, per Million piRNAs mapped), Ping-pong pair density: ND (Non-Dysgenic, per Million piRNAs mapped). Type I: Higher in copy number in 160, higher in piRNA abundance in 160, F1 piRNA ping-pong pair density defined by maternal loading. Type II: Higher in copy number in 160, higher in piRNA abundance in 160, F1 piRNA ping-pong density equilibrated. Type III. Higher in copy number in 160, higher in piRNA abundance in 160, F1 piRNA ping-pong density higher in dysgenic. Type IV: Higher in copy number in 9, higher in piRNA abundance in 160, F1 piRNA ping-pong pair density defined by maternal loading. Type V: Higher in copy number in 9, higher in piRNA abundance in 160, no ping-pong pairs detected. Type VI: Higher in copy number in 9, equivalent piRNA abundance in 9 and 160, F1 piRNA ping-pong density higher in non-dysgenic.