Table 3. One-way sensitivity analysis of hypertension treatment inputs.
Strategy | Strategy 1: Treat all stage two hypertension patients to goal of <140/90 if age 35–64 y, goal of 150/90 if age ≥65, in addition to CVD patients | Strategy 2: Treat stage two and stage one, goal <140/90 if age 35–64 y, goal of 150/90 if age ≥65, in addition to CVD patients |
---|---|---|
Comparator for ICER | Treat only CVD patients (base case) | Strategy 1 |
Main assumptions simulations | Int$9,000 (¥32,000)Δ | Int$13,000 (¥47,000)§ |
Assume higher CVD incidence | Int$7,000 (¥26,000)Δ | Int$10,000 (¥37,000)Δ |
Sex | ||
Males | Int$7,000 (¥24,000)Δ | Int$12,000 (¥41,000)Δ |
Females | Int$12,000 (¥44,000)Δ | Int$15,000 (¥54,000)§ |
Relative risk with change in BP | ||
Lower 95% confidence interval of RRs | Int$17,000 (¥61,000)Δ | Int$15,000 (¥53,000)Δ |
Upper 95% confidence interval of RRs | Int$5,000 (¥18,000)Δ | Int$12,000 (¥42,000)§ |
Range in efficacy of antihypertensive agents (change in BP with treatment) | ||
Upper | Int$7,000 (¥23,000)Δ | Int$8,000 (¥29,000)Δ |
Lower | Int$14,000 (¥49,000)Δ | Int$27,900 (¥96,000)** |
Adherence to any pharmaceutical therapy | ||
75% | Int$7,000 (¥25,000)Δ | Int$14,000 (¥49,000)§ |
25% | Int$25,000 (¥87,000)** | Int$47,000 (¥165,000)¶ |
Range of severity of side effects of antihypertensive medications | ||
Upper | Int$9,000 (¥32,000)Δ | Int$14,000 (¥ 48,000)§ |
Lower | Int$600 (¥2,000)Δ | Int$13,000 (¥ 46,000)Δ |
Range of drug costs | ||
Low cost: Average of lowest national essential medicines costs per antihypertensive class | Int$8,000 (¥27,000)Δ | Int$10,000 (¥131,000)Δ |
Lowest cost: Average of median costs per antihypertensive class, Yunnan province essential medicines list | Int$9,000 (¥31,000)Δ | Int$12,000 (¥34,000)Δ |
High cost: Average of median costs per antihypertensive class, Shanghai municipality essential medicines list | Int$19,000 (¥67,000)§ | Int$37,000 (¥131,000)¶ |
Range of monitoring costs | ||
Lower monitoring cost* | Int$8,000 (¥31,000)Δ | Int$12,000 (¥42,000)Δ |
Less frequent monitoring† | Int$8,000 (¥29,000)Δ | Int$10,000 (¥35,000)Δ |
Higher monitoring cost | Int$9,000 (¥32,000)Δ | Int$14,000 (¥48,000)§ |
More frequent monitoring‡ | Int$10,000 (¥34,000)Δ | Int$21,000 (¥75,000)§ |
Hypothetical cost scenarios | ||
Increase hypertension treatment costs 10% | Int$10,000 (¥34,000)Δ | Int$15,000 (¥53,000)§ |
Increase CVD treatment costs 50% | Int$7,000 (¥24,000)Δ | Int$11,000 (¥40,000)Δ |
Increase both cost inputs above | Int$7,000 (¥26,000)Δ | Int$13,000 (¥46,000)Δ |
Without costs of screening, program administration, or implementation (medication, monitoring, and side effect costs only) | Cost-saving | Int$12,000 (¥42,000)Δ |
* WHO CHOICE lowest outpatient visit cost for China
† Stage two twice yearly, stage one once yearly
‡ Stage two four times yearly, stage one three times yearly
Δ Less than 1 x China’s 2015 GDP per capita (<Int$11,900; international dollars)
§ Less than 2 x China’s 2015 GDP per capita and greater than 1 x GDP per capita (≥Int$11,906 and < Int$23,812)
**Less than 3 x China’s GDP per capita and greater than 2 x GDP per capita (≥Int$23,812 and <Int$35,718)
¶ Greater than 3 x China’s GDP per capita (≥Int$35,718)